Skip to content

Restore CLA Gate status publishing#5329

Merged
bfops merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
bot/fix-cla-gate-status
Jun 15, 2026
Merged

Restore CLA Gate status publishing#5329
bfops merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
bot/fix-cla-gate-status

Conversation

@clockwork-labs-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description of Changes

Restores CLA Gate as a repository-owned commit status on the actual target SHA.

The merged workflow tried to use the Actions job result for status events. Those runs are attached to the default-branch SHA, so a license/cla status on a PR head can trigger the workflow without creating any required context on the PR commit. This change mirrors the license/cla result back to CLA Gate on the PR or merge-group SHA.

API and ABI breaking changes

None.

Expected complexity level and risk

  1. This is a narrow workflow fix for the required CLA check context.

Testing

  • Ruby YAML parse for .github/workflows/cla-gate.yml
  • git diff --check
  • Confirm a new license/cla status posts CLA Gate on the same PR head SHA

@bfops bfops left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, let's try this one.

@clockwork-labs-bot clockwork-labs-bot force-pushed the bot/fix-cla-gate-status branch from d8c2e3f to f6ce1e5 Compare June 15, 2026 18:00

@bfops bfops left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

okay, let's try this one

@bfops bfops enabled auto-merge June 15, 2026 19:51
@bfops bfops added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 15, 2026
Merged via the queue into master with commit eb5b287 Jun 15, 2026
33 of 34 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants